APA   Click to copy
Redden, R. S., Hilchey, M. D., & Klein, R. M. (2016). Peripheral stimuli generate different forms of inhibition of return when participants make pro- versus anti-saccades to them. Attention, Perception, &Amp; Psychophysics, 78(8), 2283–2291. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1175-7

Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Redden, Ralph S., Matthew D. Hilchey, and Raymond M. Klein. “Peripheral Stimuli Generate Different Forms of Inhibition of Return When Participants Make pro- versus Anti-Saccades to Them.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 78, no. 8 (2016): 2283–2291.

MLA   Click to copy
Redden, Ralph S., et al. “Peripheral Stimuli Generate Different Forms of Inhibition of Return When Participants Make pro- versus Anti-Saccades to Them.” Attention, Perception, &Amp; Psychophysics, vol. 78, no. 8, 2016, pp. 2283–91, doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1175-7.

@article{ralph2016a,
  title = {Peripheral stimuli generate different forms of inhibition of return when participants make pro- versus anti-saccades to them},
  year = {2016},
  issue = {8},
  journal = {Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics},
  pages = {2283-2291},
  volume = {78},
  doi = {10.3758/s13414-016-1175-7},
  author = {Redden, Ralph S. and Hilchey, Matthew D. and Klein, Raymond M.}
}